Liberal Media Elite

Foul-mouthed political and cultural commentary from the peanut gallery that is the Upper Midwest
December 31, 2007

New Year’s resolution: Stop reading the Strib’s political coverage

Author: Matthew // Filed under: 2008 // No Comments »

The Strib—Minnesota’s media powerhouse, it’s own gray lady (with splooshy color grafix, for to understand things easier)—has become teh suck, a veritable Par Ridder masterpiece of provincialism and rah-rah-rah, common-sense conservatism. It’s the kind of media Fox would produce: down-home jingoism with naked family values. Nothing sells better than telling the American people They’re Okay Just the Way They Are.

Because, apparently, our hockey-playing, regular-guy, suburban-strip-mall governor was in New Hampshire stumping for John McCain. And, despite the fact the Republican nomination is ridiculously wide open, the Strib’s writer, Mark Brunswick, can’t get two grafs into the story without talking about Pawlenty serving as vice president. WHAT DOES PAWLENTY SHILLING FOR MCCAIN MEAN? COULD MINNESOTA SEND ANOTHER MAN TO THE WHITE HOUSE AS VICE PRESIDENT? IS THAT WHAT MINNESOTA IS BECOMING KNOWN FOR? OH, IT COULD CHANGE THE ENTIRE LANDSCAPE OF THE PRESIDENTIAL CONTEST!!!

Shut up. If Pawlenty really was an emerging Republican leader, wouldn’t McCain have sent the guy to Iowa instead? I mean, that’s a neighboring state. If Pawlenty is so famous and emerging and worthy of of Minnesota’s breathlessness, wouldn’t his fame have more pull inside—oh, I don’t know—the friggin’ region he’s from? Because I somehow doubt that most people in New Hampshire give a shit about who the governor of Minnesota is unless it’s Jesse Ventura and, even at that, it’s not so much because he’s the governor of Minnesota as it is that he was a professional wrassler. Leader, shmeader. Pawlenty is about as emerging and rising a leader as Jennifer Granholm.

Anyway, I’m glad Timmy got to take a little trip outside St. Paul:

Many [other New Hampshirites] said that Pawlenty was not necessarily a household name but that they seemed to remember his face from television reports on the Aug. 1 Interstate 35W bridge collapse.

“We didn’t see enough of him to have much of an impression,” said Rob Gregory of Merrimack, N.H.

Like a phoenix rising from the ashes. 9/11 launched Giuliani, 8/1 launches Pawlenty. And their future political careers are directly proportional to the number of body bags their tragedies produced. And thus the secret to Republican success is revealed. Let us pray.

Happy ‘08, everybody!

December 28, 2007

Michael Moore, the Motion Picture Association of America and the eventual fall of American civilization

Author: Matthew // Filed under: Media, schmedia, Rants // 2 Comments »

I got back from a little pre-holiday visit to Seattle and found three documentaries from Netflix in my mailbox. They were all very good, especially “Helvetica,” the one about the font Helvetica, which hasn’t anything to do with politics, so we’ll skip that here. Anyway, the other two were “Manufacturing Dissent” by Debbie Melnyk and Rick Caine and “This Film Is Not Yet Rated” by Kirby Dick.

Taken together, “Manufacturing” and “Rated” present a deeply unnerving portrait of American popular culture and American political culture. Because, in a media-saturated republic, what is politics than just another form of celebrity? Our elections are more about who Americans want to have a beer with and what church it’s perceived the candidates attend than any sort of serious, real-world concern. Many differences between Red and Blue, GOP and Democratic are really more cultural than political, after all. Which is a legitimate and deep split, but let’s not confuse that with being serious-minded citizens.

I maintain that the pro-torture crowd is deeply out-of-touch with reality and history. How else can it be explained that these self-aggrandizing defenders of America have so little idea about America? They have spent too much time with Kiefer Sutherland and too little with Montesquieu. To wit, there is no political thought behind the American right, there is only pop culture. Torture works in movies, so it must work in reality. No liberal school of thought would allow them to think what they think and still be democrats (notice the little L and little D). No, they are beyond that; they have grown up and out, like so much ether. Alas, the legitimacy to modern conservatism is fiction because, well, the ideas behind it are rooted in fiction. Specifically “Die Hard.” It is not philosophy, it’s a screenplay with a very horrible ending.

Not that us on the left are much better; indeed, much of the time we express envy at how forcefully passionate the right wing can be over nothing. Watching the clashes Michael Moore inspires in “Manufacturing” was tragic: people were thinking, but in a very reactionary, reptilian, brain-stemmy kind of way, that is, they were not thinking at all, but playing a game, a reality show with 300 million in its cast, all tears and betrayal. Our polarization is real but superficial. It’s an accessory. It’s like a big, important version of debating which New Kid on the Block you’re totally going to marry someday.

While mine is a dim view of the American people, it’s also a fairly accurate one and maybe being harsh on my fellow citizens isn’t so much I-hate-freedom as it is just a profound disappointment in what we’re able to squander at light speed. Which is, um, a lot. Uncontested superpowers have never been very good at discipline, I suppose.

Anyway, I came to be very depressed after the 196 minutes of those two documentaries. Our country’s politics and media and corporations have all been kind of combined into some sort of über-goo that permeates our culture and is so pervasive that we can’t even move. Kirby Dick, for example, brings up the idea—and then proves it beyond a reasonable doubt—that a handful of companies control 90% of all media and that the Motion Picture Association of America is an unelected force that controls Hollywood, always erring on the side that the most pandering, hucksterish, nannyish, hamfisted sort of decision on a film’s rating is the best decision to make. Because that’s inevitably the decision that makes cash. Because fuck honesty. I mean, I suppose I know all of this intellectually—we all do. But there’s something incredibly disquieting about being reminded of it, especially when there is research and figures to go along with it.

Which is part of the problem: Americans are no longer interested in protecting democracy or the republic and we don’t think it is being eroded because it “can’t” be, no matter how much evidence mounts to the contrary. I can’t really find another interpretation except that we’ve become incredibly lazy and unlike, say, Teddy Roosevelt, we’d rather have cheap plastic imports from China than worry about corporations completely undermining the rule of the people. There’s a certain exquisite sin to this behavior, I think.

As of this moment, we’re very unworthy of our history.

The genius was that we had a government that drew its legitimacy not from God (cf. Divine Right) but from the consent of the governed. But there is no such thing as a corporation running its business with the consent of its workers. No, that doesn’t really happen, not even in forced collectives.

But what made me really queasy was this:

“If there were a vibrant left in the United States, Michael Moore’s milquetoast radicalism would be laughed at rather than laughed with.” —David Marsh of Rock ‘n’ Roll Confidential

Yes. Anyway, all I really wanted to do was talk to Natascha about all this; I don’t actually have a point. But she’s visiting her mom in Germany. And seriously, how stupid is it that she carries the passports of three countries but doesn’t have a triband phone so I can call her when she’s out of town? God! So dumb! Bitch, get with the 21st century.

December 21, 2007

“You’d rather starve a forest than drive a Hummer…”

Author: Matthew // Filed under: Rants // No Comments »

I ♥ it. Watch much.

December 20, 2007

Hack Attack!

Author: Rik // Filed under: POTUS // 1 Comment »

Yesterday the EPA ruled that California could not have a waiver that would have allowed the state to significantly cut tailpipe emissions by 2016. After the love-in of the announcement of the new energy bill, which has fairly tame fuel consumption reductions, the administration went back to its old self and turned the effort to cut air pollution into a typical hate fest.

It did this because of lobbying by the automakers, who have tried, unsuccessfully, to have courts overturn the California policy. Stephen L. Johnson, the head of the EPA, made the decision to deny California its waiver despite the assessment of his own staff that:

1.) There was no legal basis for doing so.
2.) That if California is denied the waiver and sues the EPA it will “almost certainly win”.

You best believe that California is gonna sue. The state has long been the nation’s innovator when it comes to air pollution reduction. California, under the Clean Air Act, is allowed to develop more stringent standards than the national standards, so long as it gets a waiver from the EPA. It has never before been denied a waiver. 18 other states, representing 45% of the US auto market, have adopted or pledged to implement the California standard. Safe bet they’ll be joining California in the suit.

So…why? Why would the EPA, specifically why would Bush toady Stephen Johnson, override the recommendations of his staff, of external scientists and legal experts and issue a decision that the EPA will have to reverse?

‘Cause he can, y’all. ‘Cause that overturning will take place on someone else’s watch. ‘Cause Bush and Cheney get to point to yet another victory for business interests. It’ll make ‘em way more valuable on the lecture circuit down the road.

December 19, 2007

Screw the Presents…do this instead

Author: Rik // Filed under: Uncategorized // No Comments »

Cross-posted at my personal blog

George Martin used to be a defensive lineman for the New York Giants. Back in the 70’s and 80’s. He’s a remarkable guy for a football player…breaks the dumb jock image all in pieces. He’s an executive with an insurance company (currently on a leave of absence…more on that below). One of his many interesting accomplishments over the years was setting up a program with the New York Giants and Farliegh Dickinson University to assist football players to obtain the degrees they didn’t get while playing college ball on the understanding that the money they make as pro’s won’t last forever and not everyone gets to join ESPN as a commentator.

Mr. Martin is currently walking 3300 miles across the country, from the George Washington bridge to the Golden Gate. This is a fundraiser with a goal of bringing in $10 million to assist first responders to Ground Zero who have faced ongoing health problems from breathing in the toxic dust from the buildings collapse.

Given my own love of wandering the country (emphatically NOT on foot) his fundraising method and his cause sure as hell grabbed me. If you’re looking for something to do for Christmas that doesn’t involve buying stuff you can contribute to a far greater gift…namely assisting the brave people who ran into those buildings while others were running out…by going to Mr. Martin’s website.

Feels pretty good to hit that “donate” bar on the site.

December 18, 2007

If you interfere with Hillary Clinton’s destiny…

Author: Matthew // Filed under: 2008 // 1 Comment »

…you will rip apart the fabric of time and space:

Who is this Lee Stranahan, and how can we make him a god? Or at least a Daily Show writer?

December 14, 2007

The Answer is Tax Cuts for the Wealthy

Author: Rik // Filed under: Economicon // No Comments »

The Consumer Price Index rose 0.8% in November, the highest one month increase since Katrina. Gasoline prices (code for the price of oil) drove the uptick, which impacted everything from food to clothing to airline tickets to prescription drugs.

As I’ve babbled about ad nauseum, the price of oil is a factor of production in everything. Thus, when it spikes, it drives up the price of everything. At this point the annual inflation rate is clicking along at 4.2%…which is way higher than last year’s 2.5%.

There are alot of unpleasant recessionary pressures banging away at the economy. There is a limit to how much the federal government can do about these things. Fiscal and monetary policy choices have an impact but they are not magic bulled. Nonetheless, I assure you, when the Republicans get quizzed on this as we go into Iowa, the answer is going to be tax cuts for the wealthy as a way to fight inflation. Tax cuts for the wealthy as a way to spur growth. The answer is always and only tax cuts for the wealthy. Most of the candidates are smart enough to speak in code (”make permanent the Bush tax cuts” is precisely equivalent to saying tax cuts for the wealthy and only the wealthy). If the economy is lagging the answer is tax cuts for the wealthy. If it’s booming it’s tax cuts for the wealthy. If it’s stagnating it’s tax cuts for the wealthy. If we have a surplus, tax cuts for the wealthy. If we have a deficit, tax cuts for the wealthy.

One solution for all problems. Like snake oil, you know?

What? A coverup by the Bushies? Shocked. I Am SCHOCKED, I say!

Author: Rik // Filed under: POTUS // No Comments »

While the news media go batshit crazy over the Mitchell report which says that a bunch of baseball players took steroids (no shit) but identifies particular players as guilty based on media reports that they didn’t corroborate (usually, we call that libel) there’s a nasty little coverup going on over at the SBA.

Seems they have the interesting policy that when one of their lenders is involved in fraudulent SBA loans they elevate said lenders to “preferred lender” status. Interesting policy.

More interesting is that the SBA then ignored, revised, and outright lied about the investigation from its own Office of the Inspector General (OIG). Meaning, they tried very hard to lie about what had happened and cover it the hell up.

Hmm…Bush administration lies and coverups. Sounds vaguely familiar.

December 13, 2007

Debate in Des Moinezzzz…

Author: Natascha // Filed under: 2008 // No Comments »

Nothing really exciting to report from the (very tame) final debate of the Democratic candidates in Des Moines before the Iowa caucuses on January 3, 2008. Fairly straight forward with all the talking points on ending the war, investing in renewable energies, supporting the middle class. And of course ending corporate welfare. Almost forgot that one, although Edwards answered “When I am President of the United States, I will end corporate welfare!” to each question he was given.

My favorite part was the question about how to deal with China, i.e. how do we tell them that they should be a little gentler with their little worker bees producing all those toxic toys, when our nation has lost all moral credibility internationally because we like teh torture a little too much and also owe China something like $500 gadzillion. There was a lot of huffing and puffing and “I would tell them!” on that one.

Obama definitely had the best comeback line:

He was being asked how he could possibly offer a new foreign policy with so many ex-Clinton staffers as his advisers. In response, Hillary snickered, saying something like “I am looking forward to hearing that.”, and Obama answered grinning: “Hillary, I’m looking forward to you advising me as well.”

Missing from the debate were God and Kucinich.

Does this statement make me look stupid?

Author: Natascha // Filed under: Hypocrisy (theirs), Media, schmedia // No Comments »

Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez has been named as this year’s winner of the Lawyer of the Year award by the editors of the American Bar Association Journal:

The monthly magazine gave the awards to lawyers who made the most news, said editor and publisher Edward A. Adams.

“Think about Time magazine’s Person of the Year,” Adams said in an interview. “In years past they’ve named people like Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin. So we’re not suggesting by these awards that these are the best lawyers in any sense of the word. We are saying they are the most newsworthy — and perhaps also the best.”

The winner for 2008 is Gonzales’ successor, Attorney General Michael I-don’t-know-if- waterbording-is-torture-and therefore-illegal Mukasey. The logic of this choice is equally compelling:

It’s unusual for the ABA Journal to pick its Lawyer of the Year even before the year has begun. But the magazine did just that with Mukasey for 2008, predicting in a news release that the new attorney general will be a top newsmaker “as he deals with the problems he inherited from Gonzales in the politically charged climate of a presidential election year.”

Urgh. I think my snark machine just broke.

UPDATE
I was a little tired last night but wanted to finish my thoughts on this. Why does the award, and particularly the justification for it given by Mr. Adams, bug me so much? On the surface it’s because “Hitler and Stalin got an award, too” in itself doesn’t lend too much credence to your cause and makes you look like an insensitive idiot, certainly.

Unless he lived on the moon with Steve for the past decades, the man knows that the people at TIME magazine had to defend their methodology of choosing their candidates more years than not. “Something, something of the Year” has a positive connotation, if you ask me. And probably a vast majority of the populace thinks the same thing.

And yet, he uses it as the justification for his journal’s choice, because, hey, it’s how it’s been done for years by one of the most important magazines in the country. I am not surprised that this argument comes from a lawyer. In a strange way it is strict legal positivism: Laws, once they are laws, don’t have any ethical components anymore and can be strictly separated from natural law. Meaning: it doesn’t matter if it’s ethically justifiable as long as it is legal. In a bad situation with a corrupted political system this of course means that people like him do not question how a law came about. So the man is either Fool, or Tool of 2007.

And what is it with all that crazy ESP stuff of nominating next year’s (!?) “winner” in advance?

December 11, 2007

God Is A Bullet

Author: Rik // Filed under: Hypocrisy (theirs) // 4 Comments »

Enough, already.

The security guard who killed the homicidal lunatic at the New Life church is now crediting God with guiding her…to kill. And to shoot well. Or something.

Look, I’m all for taking some whack job down but I’m not a Christian. I’m not bound by Thou Shalt Not Kill…something a cat named Jesus clarified along the way as being a non-negotiable point. So, it was weird to me to deal with the idea of armed security at a church. It is weirder to me to hear a pastor hailing the brave security guard (and I’m not being derisive there…jeanne assam, the woman who took the guy down is certainly a brave woman) as a hero for killing someone.

Again, I’m all for it. But, guys? Y’all are supposed to be opposed to it. The Jesus you are so fond of shoving down my throat left no room for justifiable homicide. To me, it’s just further confirmation that this church (founded by Hummer Haggard) is comprised of a bunch of charlatans who rather conveniently went out and created a God in their own image.

December 7, 2007

Christianist art

Author: Matthew // Filed under: Hot for God // No Comments »

There’s something exquisite—and horrifying—about this:

Christmas lights. Lee Greenwood. Together at last.

Well, at least we know who’s voting for Huckabee.

December 4, 2007

Transcatalogical

Author: Bill // Filed under: Uncategorized // No Comments »

I’ve been finding myself scrolling through the comment threads on all the latest “My Candidate is Better than Blow Jobs” diaries, or “Your Candidate could suck a monkey through 30′ of garden hose” diaries at Daily Kos and dreaming longingly of shoving bamboo splinters under my fingernails. Much like Rik, I grow weary of this whole damn process.

Luckily I still see what’s on the site every day. Otherwise, I would have missed this diary

It has everything a boy like me could love. Depraved conservative journalism, Ren and Stimpy references, an homage to Cindy Lou Whoo, and a poll on what word we should invent to name said journalism. My vote is above. “Transcatalogical,” it’s the new santorum.

DFK outfitters

Author: Matthew // Filed under: Uncategorized // 1 Comment »

It looks like Liberal Media Elite’s Democratic-Farmer-Kitten Party has its very own costume shop.

(Not politics-related, I know, but I’ve been sick for three days. Cut me some slack.)

December 1, 2007

Somethin’ for Nothin’

Author: Rik // Filed under: Uncategorized // 1 Comment »

If it looks too good to be true, then it is.

There’s a deal in the works between the Bush administration and an alliance of consumer advocates, credit counseling organizations, major mortgage lenders, and shareholder representatives to freeze mortgage rates on subprime mortgages.

Okay…a bunch of people who took really dumb mortgages will get to keep their homes, or at least have a better shot. So the people who made lousy choices will get bailed out. Very mixed emotions on that one.

Countrywide, et al, have already seen their shares soar in the 24 hours since the Wall Street Journal reported that such a deal was close…so the lenders who made really bad choices on who to grant mortgages to will get market cap restored.

But wait…someone’s got to get screwed. Aaah….here it is…shareholders in companies that bought the subprime mortgages are gonna get hosed. If, say, Countrywide can lower the resets on the subprime mortgages, then those mortgages are worth considerably less to the investors who bought them. Typically, Countrywide doing so would result in those investors suing the living hell out of ‘em. The part of the deal that’s still in question is what kind of no-sue agreement the shareholder groups will accept.

Ask yourself…will savvy investment organizations just say “no worries” and let the value of the large investments they made in buying these mortgages erode to very, very little?

Hell, no.

There will be a settlement of some sort. And it will be, at least in part, funded by the government. Which means we’re gonna pay for it somehow. Maybe I’ll be proven wrong once the final agreement is in place and the details come out. Maybe, it’s a bad solution but superior to letting the market work it out which will result in losses to individual homeowners, lenders, and shareholders. Maybe.

But, and this shocks my friends on the right, I’m a liberal who is a big fan of the idea of a free and open market. If individuals make horrible mortgage choices and lose their homes when the housing market and/or credit market inevitably change, that’s sucks. Really. But, what happens? A bunch of people get hurt while housing prices come down. Meanwhile, smart folks, even folks with limited incomes, who didn’t overextend themselves because they guessed (correctly) that housing prices were unsustainably high…who kept their credit solid…they can now move in and purchase houses they they couldn’t afford two or three years ago because prices start to drop as foreclosures rise. Artificially bailing out the market keeps housing prices higher than they should be, freezing some number of those smart people out of the market (particularly those at the lower end of the economic spectrum). We can see, sometimes in heartbreaking detail, those people who are hurt by losing their homes. We cannot see those people who are hurt because the market wasn’t allowed to correct itself. But they always, always, exist.

I am not in the camp that rails against any government intervention. Hell, I’m not even in the camp that rails against most government intervention. But there is good reason to be skeptical about those interventions and, as a result, very cautious in how or if they are administered. This seems enormously expedient and there will be, to some degree, a bailout of very wealthy people (shareholders and investors) at the expense of the unknown but very real prospective home buyers who correctly waited for the market to fix itself. And that sucks.

Bored, bored, bored.

Author: Rik // Filed under: 2008 // No Comments »

We haven’t yet had the first primary or caucus or straw vote or whatever else the media and the money people will be watching with great interest and I’m already so bored by the 2008 election (after about 18 months of presidential campaigning) I just want sit the whole thing out and write-in the Great Pumpkin next November and call it a democracy.

Anyone else tired of this shit yet?

Rove: Bush Was A Pussy About Iraq And Wanted US Policy Dictated By The French

Author: Rik // Filed under: Hypocrisy (theirs), Media, schmedia // No Comments »

This is one of my favoritest spins to ever come out of the Bush camp.

Homeboy Karl Rove is now insisting that back in 2002 when the august body known as the US Senate caved in to Bush and granted him his blank check to go into Iraq despite questionable intelligence and shifting justifications…that it was Congress, specifically the Democrats, that pushed the timeline. That the Bubble Boy wanted to take it slower so he could go build consensus amongst various allies…including the ultimate wimps, the French.

‘Course, even with the blank check granted by Congress it was still Bush who controls the specifics like how and when the war would start. Unless Homeboy Karl is saying that Bush is so much of a pussy that he rushed into war ’cause he was afraid the big mean Dems would beat him up and take his lunch money once they shoved the vote down his throat.

As proof that the mainstream journalists of the world, or at least those represented by the Washington Post, have gone back to their happy pre-2006 existence of spinelessness, the Washington Post headline reads, “Rove’s Version of 2002 War Vote Is Disputed”.

No, it isn’t disputed because others (on both sides of the aisle and even some in the damn White House its ownself) involved in the vote pointed out that it’s factually incorrect. That means it’s just wrong. A lie. Bullshit. etc.

You can go google Bush speeches from September 2002 and find about a billion quotes from the Prezzz flaying the Democrats as being weak on terror for wanting to delay the war vote and mocking them for allowing US security interests to be dictated by foreign governments.

So, I guess it means that if you want to keep America strong, you need to vote for a Democrat. ‘Cause Homeboy Karl says they’re the bad asses on the block.