Liberal Media Elite

Foul-mouthed political and cultural commentary from the peanut gallery that is the Upper Midwest
July 30, 2007

The tubes are all a-twitter

Author: Matthew // Filed under: Hypocrisy (theirs) // No Comments »

This is a long time coming. The FBI and IRS raided Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska)’s pad.

The Justice Department has been looking into the seven-term senator’s relationship with a wealthy contractor as part of a public corruption investigation.

Could it be the man responsible for the Bridge to Nowhere, the anti-welfarist who represents the (arguably) most socialist, pork-laden state in the country is corrupt?!? Really? The man who threatened to quit Congress when someone dared to suggest money be removed from Alaska and funneled into rebuilding the Gulf Coast after Katrina? Corrupt (allegedly, but who’s kidding whom)? Who would have ever guessed? You could knock me over with a feather.

Gonzales: “I’m Just Really Dumb”

Author: Rik // Filed under: POTUS // 1 Comment »

The Washington Post has an excellent article this morning on the lies of Alberto Gonzales. Of course, being the Post, the writers had no choice but to look at the lies of Fredo and come up with a totally implausible alternate theory… gotta fend off those accusations of liberal media bias, don’t you know?

Whether Gonzales has deliberately told untruths or is merely hampered by his memory has been the subject of intense debate among members of Congress, legal scholars and others who have watched him over the years. Some regard his verbal difficulties as a strategic ploy on behalf of a president to whom he owes his career; others see a public official overwhelmed by the magnitude of his responsibilities.

The article then goes on to reveal a distinct lack of truthfulness dating back a decade to Bush’s time as the Governor of Texas. It’s not like the alternative, he’s forgetful, is helpful, really. He was “forgetful” way back in the 90’s while serving under Bush in Texas (a vulgar but fun, in a sophomoric way, phrase to write). Meaning, he has always been addled and that should call into question his capability to do his job, any job, in a Presidential administration.

Stupid, however, ain’t legally actionable. And that, campers, is the golden chiclet for Fredo. “I’m just really dumb” don’t make you look so hot but it keeps you out of jail and keeps the Prezzz from being the new Nixon.

Bet it works, too.

July 27, 2007

The Kids Love Us. (Or: It took a survey to figure that out?)

Author: Bill // Filed under: Uncategorized // No Comments »

It appears the subliminal messages we Libruhls have been encoding in every iPod are working.

Younger Voters Hate The Republican Party And depending on the subgroup sampled, you could use words like abhor, loathe, detest, despise, or revile. Makes me kind of proud of my generation.

Unfortunately, we forgot to put subliminal messages informing them of election dates and polling places on the iPod, so it has yet to be seen how many will actually vote.

July 26, 2007

Holy Oversight, Batman. (Updated)

Author: Bill // Filed under: Congress, Hypocrisy (theirs) // No Comments »

Now we’re cooking with gas.

It may have been a long time coming, but we’ve (finally) got some Congressional oversight up in here. Following Harriet Miers non-appearance in front of the House Judiciary Committee, Chairman Conyers fires off a contempt citation for Ms. Miers and one for Chief of Staff Josh Bolten, just for good measure. This is actually has teeth, because, not honoring a subpoena is, well, you know, criminal. But that’s yesterday’s news, really.

(Update) Rumor had it that the DOJ wouldn’t prosecute the House contempt citation. Well, it’s official. This likely won’t come to a full vote until after the August recess, so we aren’t a total standoff yet. It might give Conyers time to dust off Inherent Contempt. Hasn’t been done since the 30’s but, options are quickly dwindling. (/update)

In case you missed Fredo’s ’stellar’ performance in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee here’s a quick recap of the proceedings:

luckovich.gif

At some point in this nonsense, a few Senators realized that the warm liquid on their shoes wasn’t in fact rain, and are now calling for a Special investigator for Fredo’s continued perjury.

And this only moments before Senator Leahy sent out the Subpoena for Turdblossom himself.

And just to pile on, Righty blog RedState is calling for Fredo’s ouster.

THIS is what I worked so hard for on our most recent elections. It may be frustrating that it’s taking so long for the truth to out and justice to be served, but, given that the shit is so deep in this “administration,” I need to have patience for Congress to sort through it all. Perhaps they need their own Poopsmith.

220px-poopsmith.PNG

I now believe…

Author: Matthew // Filed under: Hypocrisy (theirs), War(s) // No Comments »

Andrew Sullivan has a discussion going on his blog (inspired by Rod Dreher) about the lists of certainties he and his readers have abandoned in the W years. An interesting exercise. Here are mine:

1. I’m sick to my stomach from all the validation. I opposed the war in Iraq (although not Afghanistan) and during the entire debate, my sister Carole and I would scream at one another on the phone—screams of agreement, screams of frustration. I remember her saying, “Fox is saying that the president will have no choice but to go into Iraq because he’d lose face! All of these people are going to die because our president can’t back down?!?” It’s a valid point: Foreign policy at the barrel of a gun can lead to disaster. It’s a lesson we’ve got to learn, no matter how much in love the American people are with the idea of a Dirty Harry Doctrine. I had a visceral reaction to Iraq. I just had a feeling—more than any intellectual, quantifiable reaction to the evidence—that getting rid of Saddam Hussein was a damn fine idea, but these were not the people to do the job. I set aside my qualms as the war started and gave the president the benefit of my doubt and hoped and prayed the war would go quickly and well—just as any American citizen would do (with the exception of the Republican Congress under Clinton, natch, because as we all knew as gospel, the Republicans were always right about military stuff!). Now we know the mistakes are mind-boggling. The betrayal is incalculable. How I wish all of us anti-war types had been wrong. Even if it had meant the much-fabled permanent Republican majority. Better that than this.

2. The reason that liberals fight within their ranks so much is because (perhaps) we’re a lot more honest about ulterior motives, the ability of power to corrupt and the dangers of partisanship. I often lament the lack of unity among the left’s rank-and-file. But I won’t do so as frequently any longer. After seeing the lockstep marching toward a conservative decadence, I like belonging to a side that sometimes sacrifices its own power to principle (see also: Nader 2000, though I still think Nader’s a weenie). The fact that we’re willing—hell, eager to take our own down from time to time, not rally ’round, not circle the wagons… Yeah, that’s because we have some integrity. Laugh at us lefties all you want to for being multiculti do-gooders, but we’re not half the moral relativists of right-wing thinkers-cum-professional rationalizers. Maybe it’s because of our long history with being wrong and getting burned: communism, Vietnam, Monicagate. Anyway, there’s a lot of integrity among modern American liberals—a quality that the Wall Street Journal editorial page and National Review and Ann Coulter and Fox and all the other true, blind believers will never be able to buy, no matter how much cash is injected directly into their bloodstreams.

3 (a). Also, I’m glad the left doesn’t have a version of Karl Rove. I used to think we needed our own Turd Blossoms. No longer. They’re filthy people, and traitors to everything we should stand for as a country. Democracy isn’t a fucking game of football, it’s not war. It’s for the betterment of our country, the unity of our nation. Fuck you if you think you’re the only guy who should win.

3 (b). I know it won’t happen, but I’d love to see the Federal Elections Commission ban the use of market research tools in campaigns. The technologies are too sophisticated now. The spin is too refined. The line between opinion and lie is too fine, especially with the news media having been beaten into submission by the right. Market research is useful to bilk people out of disposable income—and I welcome that as a good capitalist. But focus groups and microtargeting are a pretty shitty way of engaging people in a democracy.

4. No one ever gets to use the term “Bush hater” or any term like that ever again. Those of us who were smeared with it have earned our wings: We were right. You were wrong. So maybe listen to us next time. Oh, and I think France deserves an apology, too.

July 19, 2007

Bawk bawk….chickenhawk!

Author: Natascha // Filed under: Hypocrisy (theirs), War(s) // 1 Comment »

July 16, 2007

The Next Generation

Author: Phillip // Filed under: Uncategorized // No Comments »

My eleven-year-old niece is currently taking a radio drama class. She just wrote a commercial in which she does an impression of George Bush saying “Buy this product or the terrorists will win.”

So…is it in the genes, or what?

July 13, 2007

This Is Not a Joke

Author: Phillip // Filed under: Economicon // 1 Comment »

Okay, even *I* think this shit is terrifying:

http://freemarketunderdog.com/book.php

Words fail me. And that’s saying a hell of a lot.

A Big Misunderstanding?

Author: Rik // Filed under: 2008, Hypocrisy (theirs) // No Comments »

It’s been a hell of a week for John McCain. The Great Meltdown of 2007 is gaining momentum. As much as I despise the campaign season starting over a year before the first primaries it’s been kinda fun to watch the earliest 2008 campaigner take a total header. Some kind of happy karma there.

As McCain continues to pander to the far right while simultaneously pissing them off with his stance on immigration…while simultaneously simultaneously pandering to swing voters while pissing them off with his stance on Iraq, particularly The SURGE…in this last week he’s had a surge of sorts in staff defections. There’s been a steady trickle but damn near the whole of his top posse members bailed a few days ago. Most of his Iowa team bailed out, too. He’s got serious money problems…the campaign is riddled with debt.

Way down the ladder at the moment is the fact that the co-chair of his Florida campaign got busted this week for solicitation of prostitution. Ooooh. That one ain’t gonna play well with the far right he is so judiciously courting.

Wait…it gets better…

The head of the McCain Florida campaign, State Representative Bob Allen, got busted offering a male undercover cop in a public restroom $20 for a blowjob.

Wait…it gets even better still…from the Mother Jones Blog

Allen recently introduced HB 1475 into the Florida state legislature, a bill called “Lewd or Lascivious Exhibition” that lays a mightier smackdown on offenders of Allen’s stripe…”

That is soooo Sexy Goooood. Bob “The Cruiser” Allen introduced a bill that, if it passed, would penalize him heavier than he’s gonna get penalized. Good thing he got nailed before his bill had a chance to pass. There’s a pattern here with Republican moralists from the South, going back to homeboy Mark Foley, of introducing legislation that will penalize their ownselves.

NOTE TO DEM OPPO RESEARCHERS: When a Republican introduces any “morals” legislation would you please turn the investigators loose? They’re (Allen, Foley, Vitter) providing you a roadmap of what they’re guilty of in the title of the damn proposed legislation.

Representative Allen was also Rainbow Democratic Club, a gay rights activist organization in Florida, as one of the state’s most hostile legislators towards gays.

Wait…hard to believe but it’s even way more betterer…

The McCain campaign is characterizing the arrest as a “misunderstanding”.

Really?

Here’s how that shit works:

State Representative Bob Allen: (eyes slender twink dude leaning against the sink in the public restroom…he’s taken with his eyes…and his soft lips) Hey.
Twink Dude: Hey yourself.
State Representative Bob Allen: You looking for some action?
Twink Dude: Maybe. What you got in mind?
State Representative Bob Allen: You like to suck?
Twink Dude: Maybe.
State Representative Bob Allen: (pulls a $20 out of his pocket) I’ll make it worth it.
Twink Dude: Cool. Oh…(seductively reaches into his back pocket) You’re totally arrested, bitch.

What the hell is there to misunderstand?

July 12, 2007

Teen Hookers In Eagan!

Author: Rik // Filed under: Home news // No Comments »

From the Strib

Federal authorities are investigating a 19-year-old Eagan woman suspected of operating a prostitution ring of high school students through the Burnsville motel where she worked.

She advertised mostly through Craigslist.org.

Teen hookers in Eagan and all I had to do was go to Craigslist once since November and I would’ve known about it. I mean…fuckin’ Eagan! Boring ass whitebread all the excitement of acoustic tile motherfuckin’ Eagan! DAMN! IT!

I have got to stop underestimating Minnesota.

Interim Report on the Surge: White House Says It’s Shitty…Intelligence Community Says That’s Too Generous

Author: Rik // Filed under: POTUS, War(s) // No Comments »

The White House delivered its interim report on the surge to Congress today saying that there had been satisfactory movement on 8 of 18 critical benchmarks while giving the other 10 either unsatisfactory or grading them as worse than when the surge began. The White House has said that in light of a report where satisfactory progress has been made on fewer than half of the critical benchmarks it identified back at the beginning of the year (when it said it needed to see satisfactory progress on all of the benchmarks) as justification to continue with the surge strategy.

Yesterday, high ranking intelligence experts testifying before Congress gave an even more grim assessment.

Meanwhile, in testimony before the House Armed Services Committee yesterday, senior intelligence officials said there has been no meaningful positive change in Iraq since January, when a starkly pessimistic National Intelligence Estimate warned that even if security improved, violent sectarian divisions threatened to destroy the government.

Thomas Fingar, the deputy director of national intelligence and chief of the National Intelligence Council, which wrote the January estimate, said that assessment did not change. (snip) Communal violence and scant common ground between Shias, Sunnis and Kurds continues to polarize politics,” Fingar said yesterday. Even the majority-Shiite bloc that Maliki heads, he said, “does not present a unified front” and has continued to deteriorate in recent months. Meanwhile, the provision of essential services seen as crucial in building support for the government, including electricity and oil production, remains below prewar levels, he said. Some have declined during the past six months.

(snip)

“It will be difficult and time-consuming to bridge the political gulf when violence levels are reduced, and they have not yet been reduced significantly,” he said, in what he called his “most optimistic projection.”

But wait! There’s more!

Retired Maj. Gen. John R. Landry, also a member of the intelligence council, said there have been some improvements in the Iraqi army, although much less so with the Iraqi police, who are charged with holding urban areas. But Iraqi security forces remain “ridden with a certain degree of sectarian infiltration” and lack the logistics and support capabilities that would allow them to take over from U.S. forces in most of the country, he said.

Asked by Rep. John M. Spratt Jr. (D-S.C.) whether the Iraqi forces were in a position to bring “some sort of successful closure” to the U.S. troop presence, Landry said that was “not likely.”

Iraqi military leadership and capability will require “years to develop, not months,” he said.

ACINO Watch

Author: Matthew // Filed under: Hypocrisy (theirs) // 1 Comment »

Another skirmish in the civil war between American Citizens In Name Only and the rest of us:

Terror Alert: Code MILF

Author: Matthew // Filed under: War(s) // No Comments »

This is totally why the West will win the War on Terror™:

Omar bin Laden, the al-Qaida leader’s fourth son, has married a British woman he met in Egypt last fall, British media and colleagues of the bride said Wednesday.

The bride? Not exactly blushing. This is her sixth marriage and…

Jane Felix-Browne, 51, of Moulton-Cheshire, in northwest England, was in Egypt for medical treatment of multiple sclerosis, the Times and Sun newspapers reported. She told the newspapers she met bin Laden, 27, while riding a horse near Egypt’s Great Pyramid.

WAY TO GO, JANE! I cannot but find this delicious. Mostly because it confirms, in a very weird way, the idea that sexual honesty (or, if you prefer, liberation) cannot be contained. A fine British fox—albeit a silvery one—bags some demon spawn. His dad cannot be pleased—and, really, the possibility of bin Laden’s family being corrupted morally (although this does sound technically moral, I must say) is really a fine form of revenge. Score 1-0, advantage sinful West.

This American salutes you, Jane. No, not in that way. Here’s to all the fine older ladies out there who can still teach those youngin’s a thing or two. Woooooooooo!

July 11, 2007

Defending Marriage - ‘Cause Hookers Are Cool

Author: Rik // Filed under: Rants // 2 Comments »

Republican David Vitter (R-LA) had his phone number turn up in the little black book of the DC Madam. Oops. Aaah, never mind. It’s okay. He apologized to God and his family a couple of years ago. All is forgiven. And he just apologized to his constituents. Seems a little late. The cynics among us might say it was strictly a matter of political expedience. But, they’re cynics so they don’t count.

And then it turned out that he had been a regular patron of a business run by a woman in New Orleans known as the Canal Street Madam. Double Oops. Dating back to the early 90’s. Triple oops.

No word yet on if his apologies to God and Family covered the Canal Street incidents. As we know, though, through years of empirical observation the Official Republican God is very forgiving of moral slips as long as you are a proponent of tax cuts (rendering unto Ceasar), gutting social programs (helping the least among you), and wars (thou shalt not kill). It seems contradictory, even hypocritical, but God works in mysterious ways known only to Social Conservatives, etc.

Dave, “The Horizontal Bopper”, Vitter has also been one of the leaders in Congress, first in the House and then moving on to the Senate, of the charge for a Constitutional Amendment banning gay marriage.

A greatest hits of sorts…

“Marriage is the most fundamental institution in human history.”

Actually, I’m betting prostitution is a more fundamental institution. But, it’s maybe a chicken and egg thing.

“We have to acknowledge how important those institutions (marriage, church, faith communities) are in influencing behavior.”

The Horizontal Bopper is married. He is a member of a church. He is a leader of the faith based community (whatever that is) and he digs hookers. Ergo, church, marriage, and faith cause a desire for hookers (yeah, I know it’s bullshit but I’m trying to embrace the Right’s use of if-then logic…I can see why they like it so much, it really is fun).

“I think it is appropriate given the results that we focus on upholding an institution as important as traditional marriage.”

No word on how nailing hookers impacts an individual marriage. Must not be important.

I have a long standing policy of not commenting on who a politician fucks. For the most part I don’t care. It’s irrelevant. But The Horizontal Bopper has been on a focused campaign since at least 1998 to use the choice of who someone fucks (in this case gays) as the criteria for whether or not said someone qualifies as a full or a partial citizen. Who he fucks is relevant in that he has made it relevant. Of course the question (that the Right will never answer) is should someone who fucks who they shouldn’t fuck (in the Right’s view…in this case a series of prostitutes over a long period of time) be relegated to partial citizenship status? The answer from paragons of morality like David Vitter is, yes…that’s exactly the test that should be applied. The Bible (not my choice of legal guide but it is certainly Dave’s) is unambiguous about sex outside of marriage…gay or otherwise. It is undoubtedly the case that banging a pro, unless you’re married to her, is an affront to Mr. Vitter’s critical institution of Traditional Marriage. So, then, as a Traditional Marriage terrorist, Mr. Vitter should not be allowed to marry as he is a threat to the enduring nature of the institution. He may couple with someone but he should lose all the privacy and property rights associated with the institution of marriage.

This is the core of the Fundamentalist hypocrisy on the issue of gay marriage and we have yet another Poster Boy for it. Most of its proponents are savvy enough to speak in terms of defending traditional marriage blah, blah, blah. ‘Cause just coming out and saying that fags are icky wouldn’t cut it with enough of the voting population. But that is all the marriage debate is about. If it were truly about the sanctity of marriage then adulterers and divorcees would also have some rights taken away from them in the proposed amendments. But that’s never been part of the proposals. ‘Cause the Right don’t really give a shit about the sanctity of marriage. Dudes like the Horizonal Bopper just don’t like gays.

But they do like hookers. ‘Cause hookers are cool, you know? And nailing hookers is NOT a threat to the sanctity of marriage. God says.

I hope he just gets fired

Author: Natascha // Filed under: Uncategorized // No Comments »

This story has been around for a couple of days already, but what the heck. He is an attorney for the Justice Department, and he is on fire.

Bush justice is a national disgrace
By John S. Koppel
07/05/2007

As a longtime attorney at the U.S. Department of Justice, I can honestly
say that I have never been as ashamed of the department and government
that I serve as I am at this time.

The public record now plainly demonstrates that both the DOJ and the
government as a whole have been thoroughly politicized in a manner that
is inappropriate, unethical and indeed unlawful. The unconscionable
commutation of I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby’s sentence, the misuse of
warrantless investigative powers under the Patriot Act and the
deplorable treatment of U.S. attorneys all point to an unmistakable
pattern of abuse.

In the course of its tenure since the Sept. 11 attacks, the Bush
administration has turned the entire government (and the DOJ in
particular) into a veritable Augean stable on issues such as civil
rights, civil liberties, international law and basic human rights, as
well as criminal prosecution and federal employment and contracting
practices. It has systematically undermined the rule of law in the name
of fighting terrorism, and it has sought to insulate its actions from
legislative or judicial scrutiny and accountability by invoking national
security at every turn, engaging in persistent fearmongering, routinely
impugning the integrity and/or patriotism of its critics, and protecting
its own lawbreakers. This is neither normal government conduct nor
“politics as usual,” but a national disgrace of a magnitude unseen since
the days of Watergate - which, in fact, I believe it eclipses. [...]

Amen.

Read the full article at denverpost.com>>

July 9, 2007

Rock and a Hard Place

Author: Rik // Filed under: Uncategorized // 2 Comments »

The Prezzz, to the surprise of no one, claimed executive privilege once again in the fired US Attorneys case. The blogosphere is littered with people alot smarter than I am weighing in on whether or not he can hide behind privilege. The part I’m enjoying in all this is that two of his former sycophants…er, closest aides are now caught between defying the President they used to work for (which could have legal consequences) or the Congress that issued the subpoenas (which could have legal consequences).

Money quote from the WaPo…

In the current case, Bush today directed his former White House counsel, Harriet E. Miers, and his former political director, Sara M. Taylor, not to testify before the House and Senate judiciary committees this week. Democrats want to question both about their involvement in the firings of federal prosecutors last year that have stirred a furor on Capitol Hill, even among some Republicans.

Bush’s instruction puts Miers and Taylor in an awkward position because, as former officials, they now face the choice of defying the direction of a president they both worked for or risking criminal contempt citations by Congress. Taylor’s attorney, W. Neil Eggleston, complained in a letter to Fielding and congressional chairmen over the weekend that she was willing to testify but was unfairly being put in the middle of “an unseemly tug of war.”

Couldn’t happen to nicer people.

What stereotype WON’T Strib writers reinforce?

Author: Matthew // Filed under: Hack alert!, Media, schmedia, Rants // 1 Comment »

Okay, Katherine Kersten is one thing: We’ve all come to expect every last quotation mark, we can all predict the drivel and she’s not even worth reading any longer, because we all know she’s going to rewrite press releases from the Heritage Foundation… But this?!? Claude Peck and Rick Nelson in “Whithering Glance” are doing what they do best:

Yeah, it’s the unspoken role that the DGU [Doting Gay Uncle] takes on: fabulousness appreciation.

What year do they think it is? What drugs are they on? Why do they constantly describe being a gay guy as if they have “The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert” on continual loop in their heads? Has their blood been replaced with crushed sequins and cotton candy? And since when are sentences like “Ralph Lauren is adorable in miniature” insightful and witty instead of trite and clichéd? ANSWER ME!

What bothers me the most is that they’re given carte blanche to present their trite, plastic little world as gay reality to all those Anoka County weirdos their publishers have been lusting after and tacky young women with more credit than souls who admire shit like “Ralph Lauren is adorable in miniature.” I don’t care if it’s supposed to be amusing—or amusant, sorry—it is patently offensive in its stupidity. It needs to fucking stop. Claude and Rick need to stop with the Uncle Tommy Hilfiger act. The Strib needs to stop treating its readers like mentally deficient reality-TV addicts who can only think in pigeonholes.

God, I hate them. Hate them, hate them, hate them. And Claude Peck, you fuckwad, you’d better not review my Fringe show. You’re a terrible journalist and a failure as a gay man.

July 7, 2007

Why Does Political Theatre Have to Suck, Part One of a Very Likely Continuing Series

Author: Phillip // Filed under: Rants // No Comments »

A few weeks ago, a friend and I went to go see a production at a theatre which shall remain nameless. She wrote an excellent post about how silly and pretentious the programme was, and I agree, though I think for the most part harmlessly so. I would, however, like to leap on board ridiculing the symbol next to some of the actor’s names, which indicated the following:

“Supports peace in the world, equality and justice for all, and the fundamental human rights of speech and all forms of artistic expression.”

Now, why does this get under my skin so much? Well, perhaps because I don’t *agree* with it. I’m no pacifist, and I don’t support peace on general principle — I believe in the concept of self-defense, and recognize that we live in a world where self-defense is frequently necessary. I also don’t necessarily support the idea of equality — there are, after all, those who devote their lives to helping others, and those who devote their lives to spreading harm, and I don’t see those as being morally equivalent.

Some will say that I’m missing the point, and they’re absolutely correct — because this sentence is so ridiculously vague that it could mean just about anything. And that’s what I find so offensive about it — that it is smug, and self-congratulatory, and purports to be daring while saying nothing whatsoever at all.

Perhaps you’ve become so insulated that you believe that a statement like this is still challenging and provoking. But it’s nothing more than cheap applause line, the kind that many college theatre groups are fond of making, and I don’t accept it from you, because you are fucking better than this.

July 6, 2007

As original as salt on popcorn

Author: Matthew // Filed under: Stupid Strib letters to the editor // 2 Comments »

The Strib has a letter today… I’m not going to say what it’s about. I’ll let you guys guess:

[...] Maybe we should change the state motto to the land of 10,000 taxes and the state where nothing is allowed.

JOE GANGELHOFF, LAKEVILLE

Let the voting begin! Oh, yes, and shut up, Joe Gangelhoff of Lakeville.

[poll=4]

July 4, 2007

The Greatest “Fuck-You” in History

Author: Phillip // Filed under: Rants // 2 Comments »

We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness — That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such From, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Two hundred and thirty-one years ago today, fifty-six men were preparing to sign their own death warrant.

(The date is somewhat arbitrary — the fourth was the adoption by the Continental Congress, not the date of its endorsement by various colonial delegates. Still, tradition is tradition.)

It’s just something I was thinking about, as I see all the chest-beating and flag-waving, all these cries of patriotism and nationalism — that there was a time when this date was chosen to celebrate the rebellion against authority, not submission to it.

After all, a death warrant is exactly what the Declaration of Independence was — we’ve somehow ended up with this image of stodgy, stately old men signing a document that was already held in reverence. Then as now, there were plenty of people who enjoyed peace, security, and luxury, urging everyone not to make trouble, to keep your heads down, everything’s gonna stay afloat as long as you don’t rock the boat — and there were a number who were prepared to paint a target on their own heads and those of everyone they loved, for a principle.

It’s a hell of a document, perhaps the single most eloquently phrased “Fuck-you” in human history. Hell, every time a new “war power” is declared, every time I’m told not to question our government, I remember the words:

…when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future Security.

So fuck you, Bush, fuck you, two-party duopoly, fuck you, all of those people telling me what to do, what to think and what to feel. Jefferson may have articulated the idea with better skill than I’m capable of, but the spirit remains the same.

In any case, I’m off to enjoy the fine American tradition of Chinese fireworks. But let’s not forget to raise a glass and toast to what Independence Day is all about:

Here’s to high treason. I’ll see you around.